PARP Inhibitor Broadly Active in Ovarian Cancer

PARP Inhibitor Broadly Active in Ovarian CancerMaintenance therapy with a PARP inhibitor led to significant prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, a large placebo-controlled trial showed.

Median PFS approached 2 years in patients treated with niraparib as compared with 5.5 months for placebo-treated patients with germline BRCA mutations. Patients with non-BRCA disease had briefer PFS but still derived a similar magnitude of benefit when treated with the PARP inhibitor.

Niraparib-treated patients had higher rates of hematologic toxicity, but that did not lead to discontinuation in most cases, Mansoor R. Mirza, MD, of Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, reported at the European Society for Medical Oncology conference.

“Niraparib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, regardless ofBRCA mutation status,” Mirza said during a press briefing. “These landmark results warrant niraparib maintenance treatment for the whole study population.”

The findings were published online simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The observation that patients benefited from niraparib regardless of BRCA status is a key finding that could influence use of the PARP-inhibitor class in the management of ovarian cancer, said Thomas Herzog, MD, of the University of Cincinnati.

“I think the fact that we’re growing a ‘pie,’ in terms of patients who are potentially eligible for PARP inhibition is important,” Herzog, who was not involved in the study, told MedPage Today. “That is the same strategy being developed with rucaparib, although the data are not out yet: Try to define a group of patients with homologous repair deficiency (HRD) who might benefit from PARP inhibition.

“People have been talking about the number of patients who might benefit from PARP inhibition, and now we’re starting to see it play out in real life. That is not only intriguing but promising for future development.”

The results continued a story that began with investigations of olaparib (Lynparza) as maintenance therapy in recurrent, platinum sensitive ovarian cancer. A phase II trialĀ that supported the drug’s FDA approval showed more modest improvement in PFS but nonetheless a significant increase versus placebo-treated patients and consistency across a subgroup analysis.

PARP inhibitors target HRD, a defect in DNA repair that, if unchecked, allows cancer to grow, proliferate, and acquire the biological immortality that characterizes fatal ovarian cancer. Investigations initially focused on the subgroup of patients with germline BRCAmutations because of a known association with HRD. However, as data accumulated, a favorable effect on PFS was observed across other subgroups of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

More recently, investigation has turned toward identifying patients with tumors exhibiting HRD, regardless of BRCA status. That scientific turn was incorporated into the design of the international, multicenter, randomized trial that Mirza reported.

“We hypothesized that niraparib … will provide a clinical benefit to all patients who have platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who are in response to platinum, regardless of BRCA mutation status,” he said.

Investigators enrolled patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Platinum sensitivity was defined as complete or partial response, followed by lack of disease progression for more than 6 months after completing the last round of platinum therapy.

Eligible patients were further categorized by presence or absence of germline BRCAmutations, resulting in two separate groups: those with BRCA mutations (N=203) and those without (N=350). Patients in each group were randomized 2:1 to receive maintenance treatment with niraparib or matching placebo. Treatment continued until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS.

The results showed that patients with BRCA-mutated disease had a median PFS of 21.0 months with niraparib and 5.5 months with placebo (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.41, P<0.001). Patients with non-BRCA tumors that exhibited HRD had a median PFS of 12.9 months with niraparib versus 3.8 months with placebo (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.59, P<0.001). The overall non-BRCA group, regardless of HRD status, had a median PFS of 9.3 months with niraparib and 3.9 months with placebo (HR 0.45, 95% C 0.34-0.61, P<0.001).

The most frequently reported grade 3/4 adverse events in niraparib-treated patients were thrombocytopenia (33.8%), anemia (25.3%), and neutropenia (19.6%), which were managed by dose modification.

Asked whether the data might apply broadly to the PARP inhibitor class, Mirza said randomized comparisons of the various agents in the class would be required to answer the question. In the absence of those trials — which he said probably will never occur — the data he reported apply only to niraparib, he added.

To view this entire article on MedPageToday.com, please click here.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s